Platform

/

Survey

/

360° Survey

360° Competency Survey from Two Perspectives

Compare self assessment and peer feedback to identify competency gaps and support employee development.

Feature Insight

Everything you need in Jenjang 360° Survey

Measure competencies, compare perspectives, keep feedback balanced, and turn gaps into development input.

From setup to gap analysis, everything is automatic

Jenjang manages the assessment flow from setting participants to calculating competency gaps.

1

HR sets participants & deadline

Define who gets assessed, who their reviewers are, and when responses close.

2

Peers assess anonymously

Reviewers complete the survey without their identity revealed, so responses are honest.

3

Scores calculated automatically

Self and peer scores are aggregated per dimension. Gap analysis runs without manual work.

4

Gaps displayed in dashboard

Results surface in the HR dashboard and directly trigger IDP recommendations per employee.

Self assessment + peer perspective

Compare how employees see themselves with how others experience their competencies.

Self assessment

Employees honestly assess their own competencies using a 1 to 5 scale.

4,21/5

Average of 7 dimensions

Peer assessment

Colleagues or reviewers give perspective from daily collaboration.

4,76/5

Average from all peers

Gap analysis

The difference between both perspectives highlights possible gaps.

-0,55

Peers rate higher

8 dimensions, 3–5 minutes to complete

Each dimension measures a key aspect of organizational conditions this month, from work culture to employee loyalty and advocacy.

Collaboration

Collaboration

Working effectively with others toward shared goals.

Adaptability

Adaptability

Ability to adjust to change and new expectations.

Leadership

Leadership

Ability to guide, motivate, and bring positive impact to those around them.

Performance & Productivity

Performance & Productivity

Consistency in producing quality work output on time.

Problem Solving

Problem Solving

Thinking through challenges and finding workable solutions.

Time Management

Time Management

Skill in prioritizing tasks and meeting deadlines.

Communication

Communication

Clarity, listening, and expression across contexts.

Each dimension scored by self and peers

Final Score produces 4 category levels

Each dimension receives a category based on the Final Score, a combination of self assessment and peer assessment.

Needs Improvement

< 2.5

Competency in this dimension requires focused and intensive development.

Adequate

2.5 - 3.4

Competency exists but still needs further development.

Good

3.5 - 4.4

Competency is well developed and consistent in daily work.

Excellent

≥ 4.5

Competency demonstrates consistent and outstanding mastery.

Integrations

360° Survey connects to jenjang ecosystem

Survey data can support competency visibility, development planning, and HR dashboards.

Most specific gap analysis source for IDP

Identified gap per dimension directly triggers automatic IDP recommendations. HR and managers can review before finalization.

Available in : IDP

Contributor to engagement index in Well-being

360° results add to the engagement index, measuring how fairly and objectively employees feel assessed by their peers.

Available in : Well-Being

Appears as activity item when HR opens a session

Survey is not sent via notifications, it automatically appears in the employee dashboard when HR activates the survey session.

Available in : Employee Dashboard

FAQ

360° Survey questions, answered

The employee assesses themselves, and their selected peers or reviewers assess them anonymously, so every score reflects both self and peer perspectives.

Turn Instinct Into Certainty

Join 300+ organizations making smarter talent decisions with Jenjang.

Request Demo

10 K+

Registered Users

50 K+

Assessments Completed

1 M+

People Data Points